It has made direct distribution much more practical for small software companies in market segments where a simple download or a SaaS-based model is practical. The advent of the Internet has created a major difference in distribution between software vs hardware companies, where there was very little difference in the past. This is because it is often tougher to hang onto a customer in the second generation (if the market has commoditized) and the market leader often has a gross margin advantage-making this tactic an ill-advised maneuver, other than as an attention-getting, short-term promotion. While hardware pricing can be just as competitive in general, it is less likely for a weaker competitor in a hardware market to introduce a “zero-margin” program. You see this scenario most often started by weaker competitors or in market segments where switching costs for customers are high. This can strain the profitability of the entire market segment and in severe circumstances can suck all the profit from the market. In a competitive software market, you often see aggressive competitors who literally “give away” the initial product (freeware or freemium models) to build an installed based and then rely on an upgrade revenue stream or advertising revenues to make a profit downstream. For software businesses, the negligible direct product cost can act as the other end of the proverbial double-edge sword when it comes to pricing. In the hardware business, you tend to see a lot of simple pricing models that are cost-based. However, in my consulting practice I rarely find this pricing approach to be used rigorously-whether the company markets a software or hardware product. Optimal pricing of both hardware or software should be based upon a value-based approach-with market segmentation as the key to success. The major difference comes down to direct product cost, which in the long run creates a pricing floor for anyone who would actually like to make a profit. The big difference between software vs hardware business models here also is related to costs. But in general, this is an area where the advantage goes to software. There are hardware businesses with excellent gross margins (dominant semiconductor companies come to mind) as well. Remember, throughout this article I am speaking in “on average” terms. As a result, it easier for software companies to reach profitability sooner and if a large enough market is found, sustain that profitability. This is primarily due to the negligible cost-of-goods-sold for most software companies. MarginsĪnother important area where software companies generally have an advantage is in margins-both in the area of typical gross margins as well as the potential for higher net margins. So except for startups aiming at huge, established markets and backed by substantial institutional capital, it’s much easier for typical startup software companies to adequately capitalize their businesses with much smaller funding rounds, relative to their hardware and semiconductor counterparts. This is primarily because they don’t need to invest in expensive semiconductor development tools and semiconductor masks for semi companies, manufacturing plants/equipment for all types of hardware companies, manufacturing engineering personnel, unfinished and finished goods inventory, etc. One of the larger differences is that software companies generally require much lower capital to reach profitability and continued growth. So what are the differences and similarities between software vs hardware for successful businesses? Hardware vs Software Capital Requirements But sometimes there is a choice between these two distinct business models (or a combination of both) – so let’s take a look at the differences and relative advantages of each. Hardware vs software business models is something that you don’t often see a lot of debate about. But I have substantial hardware market experience as well, so I also work with hardware companies. Much of my consulting practice centers on working with software-based companies.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |